Science, meet World
Archive for May, 2011
Scienceblogging Roundup: May 15-21
May 21st
While we post lengthy discussions here on Science of Blogging, there are many research updates, news stories, videos, etc. related to science communication that we come across on a daily basis that never grace the pages of the blog. Most of these mini-stories we share with our followers on Twitter, and we encourage those of you with active Twitter accounts to communicate with us there to get real-time updates of all the stuff we are discussing (Follow Peter and/or Follow Travis). For those of you who shy away from Twitter, enjoy below the best mini-stories that we came across during the prior week along with links to the original source so that you can follow the full story.
- How to email busy people (humbledMBA)
- Social Media: Friend or For? (Mobilize This!)
- The history of objectivity in journalism (Slate)
- The public wants more science journalism (From the Lab Bench)
- David Shiffman and other attendees at the 2nd International Marine Conservation Congress (IMCC2) are doing an amazing job of live-tweeting their conference experiences. Check out the#IMCC2 hashtag to see how the conference is being shared in real-time (thanks to Jason Goldman for sending it our way).
Those are the posts that caught our eye this week. Enjoy the long weekend!
Travis
Get To Know a Scienceblogger: Dirk Hanson
May 19th

Dirk Hanson - Addiction Inbox
Today we have another post in our Get To Know A Scienceblogger Series.
Dirk Hanson is a freelance science writer and business journalist with more than 30 years of professional experience. He has written for numerous magazines and trade publications, and is the author of three books including The Chemical Carousel which received an Independent Publisher Book Award in the Health/Medicine/Nutrition Category. His current area of coverage is the neuroscience of drug addiction. Dirk currently maintains a popular blog on drugs and the science of substance abuse called Addiction Inbox, serves as senior contributing editor for the new health web site The Fix, and has contributed phenomenal articles at BrainBlogger. You can learn more about Dirk and his books at www.dirkhanson.org.
What is the topic of your blog?
Addiction Inbox covers articles and health studies about drugs, addiction, and alcoholism, with an emphasis on the most recent scientific and medical findings. And anything else I find interesting related to drugs and the brain.
What was your primary reason for starting a blog?
I kind of jumped and got pushed simultaneously. I was finishing a book about scientific research on drug and alcohol addiction. Print outlets were in disarray, authors and editors were clueless, and I wanted an online platform from which to continue the conversation and to serve as a point of contact for the book. But the blog grew slowly and steadily and took on a life of its own. I’ve been an online journalist ever since.
How often do you post, and roughly how much time goes into each post?
I’ve gone slightly against the grain on this one. My posts are longer and less frequent that many bloggers—although this is a tendency throughout the science blogging community. I sometimes put up 1,200 word posts or longer. I try to put up something new every 3-4 days—which, from the old-school blogging perspective, is an eternity, not to mention a slow and painful death. Happily, I found out that a sort of bastard hybrid—call it long-form blogging—works for me, and allows for more in-depth posts, which I like. How long does it take to write a good blog post? From about 20 minutes to maybe three days.
How do you fit in time for social networking?
I think at least some of it comes out of time that was previously eaten up by the telephone and television. And in my case, since I earn part of my living online, I just make sure to make time for it. I admit I never expected to be drawn into the world of Facebook and Twitter through my blogging activities, but that is, in fact, what has happened. As a journalist doing the bulk of my nonfiction writing on the net these days, I’m pretty deeply involved with those two media at the professional level on a daily basis.
Have there been any benefits to blogging, either personally or professionally? More >
To Blog Or Not To Blog?
May 4th
Dear Professor, To blog or not to blog? This is not a question that you should worry about…for now. You compete successfully in three peer review arenas: publishing, grant seeking and tenure & promotion (T&P). These three are interdependent with success in one begetting success in another. The three are built on the same assumption: that your peers are in the best position to critique and thus make awards of publications, of grants and of tenure. This isn’t going to change dramatically in the near future, so please don’t fret over all this blogging stuff. Your klout score is not about to sway your T&P committee.
But note that in Canada, at least, times they are a changin’ (♫)
Canadian research funding is dominated by three federal granting councils (SSHRC, CIHR and NSERC) all of whom are rolling out new funding programs with non-academics on the peer review committees. As I mentioned in a previous blog some (admittedly only a few) peer reviewed journals are including non academics on their editorial boards. Campus-community collaborations are increasingly recognized by T&P committees (especially when the university based scholar and his/her community partner receives a $1M Community University Research Alliance) and there is even a national alliance to examine academic reward and incentive structures for community engaged scholarship.
But you don’t have to worry about that…for now.
Just know that blogs get way more traffic than your peer reviewed paper ever will. More >

